FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceEnterpriseCommunicationsFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Consumer groups want protection from broadcaster-cable retrans squabbles

Free Newsletter

FierceCable is a daily email news briefing for cable service provider executives. Benefit from our time-saving update on TV Everywhere, Interactivity, Headend Consolidation, DOCSIS 3.0, and other cable industry business and technology news. Sign up today!



Tools

Three media watchdog groups--the Parents Television Council, Consumers Union and Free Press--would like some protection from the FCC in the event of future cable-broadcaster retransmission battles.

To carry it further, the group has opened a slimy can of worms by suggesting a form of a la carte subscription where subscribers could opt out paying for or viewing channels carried as part of a bundled retransmission agreement and get a discount for the refused channels.

"Cable customers should get what they pay for instead of being held at the mercy of these disputes between the cable companies and the broadcasters," said Joel Kelsey of Consumers Union. "Consumers should be able to choose their channels and they should get a refund when they lose access to the channels they pay for."

For more:
- see this story

Related articles:
FCC taking hands off of broadcast retransmission battles
All sides weigh in, none happily, on must-carry/retransmission issue
Broadcasters say they're not to blame for higher cable rates


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceCable Email Newsletter:


More stories about Cable Customers   Parents Television Council   Media Watchdog Groups   broadcasters   FCC   Free Press   Cable Companies   Broadcaster   Cable Rates